Brokeback Watchtower
JoinedPosts by Brokeback Watchtower
-
362
No 'Tight Pants' policy is now official - classed as 'disturbing'
by wizzstick inin short:- tight pants is no longer just a am3 hang up (or is that a hang up on the well hung?
)- brothers who have effeminate body language are flagged up- as are sisters with 'masculine' hair styles or dress- such dress is 'disturbing to the congregation'- the above must heed the (repeated) counsel from the elders...or they get stripped of the right to share on the ministry- however...this will not be revealed (announced) to the congregation.
wow.
-
-
-
362
No 'Tight Pants' policy is now official - classed as 'disturbing'
by wizzstick inin short:- tight pants is no longer just a am3 hang up (or is that a hang up on the well hung?
)- brothers who have effeminate body language are flagged up- as are sisters with 'masculine' hair styles or dress- such dress is 'disturbing to the congregation'- the above must heed the (repeated) counsel from the elders...or they get stripped of the right to share on the ministry- however...this will not be revealed (announced) to the congregation.
wow.
-
-
Brokeback Watchtower
This new directive from the Governing Body will only increase suppression of the sexes that every human has due to societies determination of what is proper, causing more suicides and querky behavior to those under these restrictions causing a increase of child molestation lawsuits over time. What jerks they just can't hide themselves from from it no way. All Hail the Governing Body for being such total Jerks! -
362
No 'Tight Pants' policy is now official - classed as 'disturbing'
by wizzstick inin short:- tight pants is no longer just a am3 hang up (or is that a hang up on the well hung?
)- brothers who have effeminate body language are flagged up- as are sisters with 'masculine' hair styles or dress- such dress is 'disturbing to the congregation'- the above must heed the (repeated) counsel from the elders...or they get stripped of the right to share on the ministry- however...this will not be revealed (announced) to the congregation.
wow.
-
-
Brokeback Watchtower
The Governing Body is following the same course as Hitler in their campaign to round up all the gays and put a pink triangle on them and sent them off to work camps. In fact they resemble the Inquisition back in the day when the church ruled:
-
362
No 'Tight Pants' policy is now official - classed as 'disturbing'
by wizzstick inin short:- tight pants is no longer just a am3 hang up (or is that a hang up on the well hung?
)- brothers who have effeminate body language are flagged up- as are sisters with 'masculine' hair styles or dress- such dress is 'disturbing to the congregation'- the above must heed the (repeated) counsel from the elders...or they get stripped of the right to share on the ministry- however...this will not be revealed (announced) to the congregation.
wow.
-
-
Brokeback Watchtower
I betcha the reason why they are going after effeminate mannerism in men and all is because AM#3 don't want to see any limp wrist'd elder's in moderately tight pints giving talks representing gay bashing/smashing sock puppet Jehovah. And perhaps they feel that the reason they are in such dire financial straits is because they have not been hard enough on gay's to please Jehovah, after all they equate being gay and a child molester as the same thing in their severely blunted/dulled intelligence, which cannot distinguish the difference. -
362
No 'Tight Pants' policy is now official - classed as 'disturbing'
by wizzstick inin short:- tight pants is no longer just a am3 hang up (or is that a hang up on the well hung?
)- brothers who have effeminate body language are flagged up- as are sisters with 'masculine' hair styles or dress- such dress is 'disturbing to the congregation'- the above must heed the (repeated) counsel from the elders...or they get stripped of the right to share on the ministry- however...this will not be revealed (announced) to the congregation.
wow.
-
-
Brokeback Watchtower
eat your eyes out tony tight pants:
-
362
No 'Tight Pants' policy is now official - classed as 'disturbing'
by wizzstick inin short:- tight pants is no longer just a am3 hang up (or is that a hang up on the well hung?
)- brothers who have effeminate body language are flagged up- as are sisters with 'masculine' hair styles or dress- such dress is 'disturbing to the congregation'- the above must heed the (repeated) counsel from the elders...or they get stripped of the right to share on the ministry- however...this will not be revealed (announced) to the congregation.
wow.
-
-
Brokeback Watchtower
Notice how all this animosity about clothing is happening soon after Michele Jackson died. -
24
You have a $100,000,000 budget to do a global campaign against the WTBS worldwide. How would you spend it?
by JWchange inwhat if by inheritance, winning the lottery or any other way, you suddenly got your hands on $150m after tax.
you maybe would spend a third of this giving your extended family financial security for life.
you maybe would buy a boat and a few investment properties.
-
-
Brokeback Watchtower
I would put up 50 huge bill boards exposing their corruption and hypocrisy around each and every WT corporation complex so that anyone entering the place or leaving would be bombarded with the message. This would be a swell thing to do if I had money to burn. -
63
AUSTRALIA – Artemis Legal launches inquiry into group and class action lawsuits against Jehovah’s Witnesses
by jwleaks injehovah's witnesses - group action lawyers fighting for justice | artemis legal .
artemis legal | watchtower claims.
13 october 2015 .
-
-
Brokeback Watchtower
I wonder if it would be more advantageous for the Royal Commission to go after the main corporation if the branch can't come up with the funds imposed upon them? -
9
You must be right Simon. I must be wrong.
by umbertoecho insimon.
this is your forum.
for the rc have it all wrong.. i am wrong to follow the accurate guidance of these commissioners.
-
-
Brokeback Watchtower
Maybe it might be good to see if they can get information from the RC about this firm and the number of cases they have been before them and the representation ratio they have been for the victims and large corporations. They may have lots of experience in getting just settlements for the victim in the Australian courts. -
63
AUSTRALIA – Artemis Legal launches inquiry into group and class action lawsuits against Jehovah’s Witnesses
by jwleaks injehovah's witnesses - group action lawyers fighting for justice | artemis legal .
artemis legal | watchtower claims.
13 october 2015 .
-
-
Brokeback Watchtower
I'm thinking this firm has the legal expertice to handle legal issues before the RC representing businesses that is all they said, they said nothing about being recommended by the RC. I'm sure the RC will stay away from giving any particular law firm a recommendation.
I think calling this law firm a deceptive charleton or some such thing is without a solid foundation. Non the less pick wisely and use due diligence in finding one that will put your interest in getting compensated first in mind.